Replace per-tool rule trees (.cursor/rules, .claude/rules, .codex/rules) with a single wiki/architecture/ source — 11 pages + README — readable as plain markdown by any agent. Canonical skills live in .agents/skills/; .claude/skills, .cursor/skills, .codex/skills are directory symlinks. AGENTS.md is the entrypoint (rewritten as a lean overview, no per-tool path lists). CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, and .github/copilot-instructions.md all point to it. Add open-pr skill (uses .github/pull_request_template.md as the source of truth for the PR body) and remove the dangling .claude/CLAUDE.md relative symlink. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.7 KiB
2.7 KiB
name, description, allowed-tools
| name | description | allowed-tools |
|---|---|---|
| open-pr | Open a pull request on pascalorg/editor using the repo's PR template. Use when the user asks to open/create a PR, push and PR, or ship a branch in the editor repo. | Bash(git *) Bash(gh *) Read |
Open a pull request against pascalorg/editor from the current branch.
1. Pre-flight
git status # confirm working tree state
git branch --show-current # confirm we're on a feature branch, not main
git log --oneline main..HEAD
Stop if:
- The current branch is
main. Ask the user to create a feature branch first. - The branch has no commits ahead of
main. Nothing to open a PR for. - There are uncommitted changes the user hasn't asked to commit.
Run a build sanity check if the change is non-trivial:
bun typecheck
bun build
Don't open the PR with a broken build.
2. Read the PR template
The template is at .github/pull_request_template.md. Read it before composing the body — the section headings and checklist items are the source of truth, not your memory of them.
cat .github/pull_request_template.md
Mirror the template exactly:
## What does this PR do?— one paragraph or a short bullet list. Link related issues withFixes #123when applicable.## How to test— numbered, concrete reviewer steps (commands to run, what to click, expected outcome).## Screenshots / screen recording— if the change is visual, paste a recording link or note that one will be added. If purely non-visual (refactor, internal API), say so explicitly so the reviewer knows nothing is missing.## Checklist— copy the boxes verbatim, ticking the ones already verified.
3. Push and open
git push -u origin HEAD
Check for an existing PR first:
gh pr view --json url 2>/dev/null
If none exists, create it. Pass the body via HEREDOC to preserve markdown formatting:
gh pr create --title "short, scope-prefixed title" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## What does this PR do?
<one-paragraph description; link issues>
## How to test
1. <step>
2. <step>
3. <step>
## Screenshots / screen recording
<link or "N/A — non-visual change">
## Checklist
- [x] I've tested this locally with `bun dev`
- [x] My code follows the existing code style (run `bun check` to verify)
- [ ] I've updated relevant documentation (if applicable)
- [x] This PR targets the `main` branch
EOF
)"
Keep the title under ~70 characters. Use a scope prefix when there's an obvious one (viewer:, core:, editor:, mcp:).
If a PR already exists, print its URL and stop — don't recreate.
4. Report
Return:
- PR URL
- Title used
- Local typecheck/build status (if you ran them)
- A note for the reviewer if anything in the checklist is left unchecked