--- name: open-pr description: Open a pull request on pascalorg/editor using the repo's PR template. Use when the user asks to open/create a PR, push and PR, or ship a branch in the editor repo. allowed-tools: Bash(git *) Bash(gh *) Read --- Open a pull request against `pascalorg/editor` from the current branch. ## 1. Pre-flight ```bash git status # confirm working tree state git branch --show-current # confirm we're on a feature branch, not main git log --oneline main..HEAD ``` Stop if: - The current branch is `main`. Ask the user to create a feature branch first. - The branch has no commits ahead of `main`. Nothing to open a PR for. - There are uncommitted changes the user hasn't asked to commit. Run a build sanity check if the change is non-trivial: ```bash bun typecheck bun build ``` Don't open the PR with a broken build. ## 2. Read the PR template The template is at `.github/pull_request_template.md`. Read it before composing the body — the section headings and checklist items are the source of truth, not your memory of them. ```bash cat .github/pull_request_template.md ``` Mirror the template exactly: - `## What does this PR do?` — one paragraph or a short bullet list. Link related issues with `Fixes #123` when applicable. - `## How to test` — numbered, concrete reviewer steps (commands to run, what to click, expected outcome). - `## Screenshots / screen recording` — if the change is visual, paste a recording link or note that one will be added. If purely non-visual (refactor, internal API), say so explicitly so the reviewer knows nothing is missing. - `## Checklist` — copy the boxes verbatim, ticking the ones already verified. ## 3. Push and open ```bash git push -u origin HEAD ``` Check for an existing PR first: ```bash gh pr view --json number,url,title,body 2>/dev/null ``` ### 3a. No existing PR → create one Pass the body via HEREDOC to preserve markdown formatting: ```bash gh pr create --title "short, scope-prefixed title" --body "$(cat <<'EOF' ## What does this PR do? ## How to test 1. 2. 3. ## Screenshots / screen recording ## Checklist - [x] I've tested this locally with `bun dev` - [x] My code follows the existing code style (run `bun check` to verify) - [ ] I've updated relevant documentation (if applicable) - [x] This PR targets the `main` branch EOF )" ``` Keep the title under ~70 characters. Use a scope prefix when there's an obvious one (`viewer:`, `core:`, `editor:`, `mcp:`). ### 3b. PR already exists → update its description Do **not** recreate the PR. Refresh the existing body so it reflects everything currently on the branch, while keeping the template structure and any reviewer-meaningful state the user already set. 1. Capture the existing body and the full branch history: ```bash gh pr view --json number,body -q '.number, .body' > /tmp/existing-pr.txt git log --oneline main..HEAD git diff --stat main..HEAD ``` 2. Reconstruct the body section-by-section. Keep the four template headings in the same order (`## What does this PR do?`, `## How to test`, `## Screenshots / screen recording`, `## Checklist`). For each section: - **What does this PR do?** — rewrite from the *current* commits and diff on the branch, not from memory. Preserve any `Fixes #123` / `Refs #123` lines from the old body. - **How to test** — regenerate concrete steps for the *current* behaviour. If a previous step is still valid, keep its wording; drop steps that no longer apply; add steps for new commits. - **Screenshots / screen recording** — preserve the existing content verbatim (links, embedded images, "N/A — …"). Do not blank it out. Only change it if the user explicitly provided a new recording. - **Checklist** — preserve the user's tick state (`[x]` vs `[ ]`) for every item that still exists in the template. Add any new template items as unchecked. If the old body contains extra sections the template doesn't have (e.g. a manual "Notes" block), keep them at the end. 3. Apply the update: ```bash gh pr edit --body "$(cat <<'EOF' ## What does this PR do? … EOF )" ``` Use `gh pr edit --title` *only* if the branch's scope has clearly changed; otherwise leave the title alone. 4. Print the PR URL so the user can confirm the edit. ## 4. Report Return: - PR URL - Title used - Local typecheck/build status (if you ran them) - A note for the reviewer if anything in the checklist is left unchecked